https://www.theskullzclan.com/forums/thread/?thread=119 https://www.theskullzclan.com/forums/thread/119/strange-benchmark/#dis-post-1041
it has sth to do with the weird coding of IV, or....

dunno  :P

Could it be that some i7 cores shut down when they are not needed? So maybe the first test is with 6 cores and therefore only a little percentage of the cpu is used. For the low settings test the cpu only used 4 active cores and therefore the percentage of usage seems higher?  


oh and seems that it's impossible to get over 67 fps with the IV benchmark, that's why there is not much fps difference between the tests.]]> Imperial Apr 04, 2011, 03:33 AM https://www.theskullzclan.com/forums/thread/119/strange-benchmark/#dis-post-1041 https://www.theskullzclan.com/forums/thread/119/strange-benchmark/#dis-post-1040 ) and found these weird results:

a) settings max @ 1920x1200 vs min @ 800x600  makes 0.06 fps difference!
b) cpu use goes up on min?
c) wtf

]]> r33nismo Apr 04, 2011, 03:05 AM https://www.theskullzclan.com/forums/thread/119/strange-benchmark/#dis-post-1040